Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • AM changed the title to ChatGPT and Coding
Posted

Yes, it is full of bugs. I tried all kind of code with mix success. You need a lot of patience to get the correct code - try and try again 🙂

But still the def-score is almost perfect.

 

Posted

For actual code output suggestions, GitHub Copilot would be a way better option. I am not sure if it can be easily integrated, though.
Moreover, GPT-* has knowledge about OMN up to 2021 only so that leads to some wrong function names too.

Posted

I agree completely. I too have experimented with GPT3.5 API (waiting for access to GPT 4) and I have learnt that we should be cautious while depending on this system. It tends to generate a lot of incorrect stuff, at the same time appearing to be quite knowledgeable!

 

I am sure these tools will improve over a period of time, but I feel they lack the "creativity" of humans. I don't want to wade into any controversy ...!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy