Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think it would be nice to have some figured bass functions. I started with these simplistic functions and I am wondering if anyone has thoughts on how to generalize them. I think it'll probably be best if eventually one would be able to simply input a list of bass notes and figures - something like (figured-bass '(c3 (5 3) d3 (4 3) e3 (6) '(c major)) and the function would return the figured bass realized. 

(defun five-three (degree root type) 
  (tonality-map `(,type :root ,root :map shift) 
              (chordize (pitch-transpose (- degree 1) (interval-to-pitch '(2 2))))))

(five-three 2 'd 'major) 
=> (e4g4b4)

(defun six-three (degree root type) 
  (tonality-map `(,type :root ,root :map shift) 
              (chordize (pitch-transpose (- degree 1) (interval-to-pitch '(2 3))))))

(six-three 3 'c 'minor)
=> (eb4g4c5)

(defun six-four (degree root type) 
  (tonality-map `(,type :root ,root :map shift) 
              (chordize (pitch-transpose (- degree 1) (interval-to-pitch '(3 2))))))

(six-four 5 'e 'minor)
=> (b4e5g5)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Stephane!

 

for some reason, the gen-chord3 examples provided with opusmodus don't seem to work. 

 

However, I think perhaps harmonic-progression could do the trick.

For example, the following creates a series of 6/5 chords  (harmonic-progression '(0 3 4 4) '(c major) :size '4 :step '((2 1 2)))

and here are some 4/3 chords - (harmonic-progression '(0 3 4 4) '(c major) :size '4 :step '((2 2 1)))

 

perhaps this is enough - although I do think it gets a bit cumbersome. If you have ideas on how to create a function that would streamline this process, I'd appreciate hearing them. I think something more similar to traditional figured bass notation format would be easier to work with (at least for me....)

 

Thanks!

Avner 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So here's what I have so far.  Any suggestions would be welcome

 

;;;; a function that splits a list ;;;;

(defun split-list (lst)
  (if lst
      (if (cddr lst)
          (let ((l (split-list (cddr lst))))
            (list
             (cons (car lst) (car l))
             (cons (cadr lst) (cadr l))))
        `((,(car lst)) ,(cdr lst)))
    '(nil nil)))

 

;;; figured-bass function ;;;;

 

(defun figured-bass-progression (progression)
  (harmonic-progression 
   (car (split-list progression)) '(c major) :size (loop for i in (car (cdr (split-list progression))) collect (+ (length i) 1))
   :step (car (cdr (split-list progression)))))

 

 

;;;; test


(figured-bass-progression '(0 (2 2) 1 (2 2 1) 2 (2 3) 3 (2 1 2) 4 (2 2 2) 5 (2 3) 6 (2 3) 7 (2 2)))==>

(c4e4g4 d4f4g4b4 e4g4c5 f4a4c5d5 g4b4d5f5 a4c5f5 b4d5g5 c5e5g5)

 

 

My questions are: 

 

1. Why would (2 2 1) create a 4/3 chord? Why would (2 1 2) create a 6/5 chord? Shouldn't this be the other way around? 

 

2. Would it be possible to convert this to traditional terminology? So one could write '(f4 (6 5)) and get the chord '(f4a4c5d5)? Obviously, this is not crucial, but I am curious to learn how to program better in lisp.

 

Thanks!

Avner

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Stephane,

 

I must say that I don't quite understand gen-chord3 - every time I evaluate the expression (gen-chord3 '(c4 eb4 g4) '((6 5) (5 3) (4 2))) I get a different result. 

 

Also, what I was hoping to do was to convert traditional figured bass (i.e., use steps in the key) into chords. Perhaps there isn't an easy way to accomplish this in opusmodus right now. 

 

Either way, would you mind explaining why gen-chord3 evaluates to different pitches every time? 

 

Thanks!

Avner 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're very welcome :-)

music21 has so much to offer - I just wish there was an easy way to convert its tools and objects into opusmodus functions.  I really enjoy the workflow of opusmodus and using lisp. Perhaps when opusmodus can read xml files directly into omn it would be easy to combine the two. 

 

All the best,

Avner 

Link to post
Share on other sites

critical thought about this:
I think in the near future this will work through "deep learning". So it is questionable how useful it is to formalize such manual and traditional "activities", such "complex rules systems" in CODE. this question generally arises in areas that focus on imitating and executing existing styles.

greetings

andré

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

...except that makes you a fun and makes you happy - and that is just as important!

added 10 minutes later

so the question will be what can be better, which will be more exciting than what deep learning (or traditional algorithms) can produce. very fast then - in my opinion - the production becomes quite simple and well done, but this has nothing to do with art (if you want) - it will be the "imitation of art", also algorithmic tools pushing you in this direction - is it "music" or the simulation of "music"?. but as VON FOERSTER said: "the map is the territory"... counteracting (radical-constructivistic) the phrase "the map is not the territory"...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Topics

    • By JulioHerrlein
      Dear All, 
       
      One interesting thing that could be implemented as a function could be a form of generating Negative Harmony.
      In the video below, there are some explanation of what it is and the origin in the Levy book.
      It was a trendy topic due to the Jacob Collier interview. And there are a lot of fun videos making versions of pop tunes using negative harmony.
       
      The way I understand it, it is simply a kind of mapping notes in relation to an axis, like in the figure below.
       

       
      So we need a function that could map a note in any register to another note in the closest register to the first on.
      So, any  C note will be mapped to G, all Db to F#, all D to F, all, Eb to E, all B to Ab, all Bb to A.
       
      It´s also possible to generate other mappings as well.
       
      I think that replace map or substitute map can do the job, but I´m not sure (I will try), but I find interesting to post it here to explore the idea.
       
      All the best,
       
      Julio
       
      It´s kind of funny to sse in this por versions how every is upside down and how you can generate an entirely new song from exactly the same material.
       
       
       
      POP TUNES with negative harmony:
       
       
       
       
       
    • By AM
      here is a sketch for an alternative "binary-(or element-)layer-FUNCTION
       
      (defun element-layer (lists &key (rnd nil)) (let ((lists (if (null rnd) lists (rnd-order lists :list t)))) (car (last (loop for x in (rest lists) with list = (car lists) collect (setf list (loop for i in list with cnt = 0 when (equal i 0) collect (nth cnt x) and do (incf cnt) else collect i))))))) (element-layer (list '(1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0) '(0 2 3 0 4 5 0 6 0 7 8 0) '(11 12 13 14 15 16 17)) :rnd nil) => (1 11 2 1 1 3 12 1 4 5 13 6) ;;; hierarchic: every 0's will be replaced by the values from the next/sub-list...  
    • By InLight-Tone
      Just bought into OM, excellent software love it.
       
      If you could be so kind, what is the key sequence to call up the search function? That last key symbol is a mystery to me.
       
      Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...