Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

conTimbre library + pitchbend

Recommended Posts

short information about this from CT:


"Currently, only the VST plugin does the pitch bend correctly, there was some reason why I did not fix the problem with the Max version, but I'll take it now.
In the short term, you can also solve it by sending the pitchbend value immediately after each noteon.
Pitchbend + - tritone."




but how to how to send "the pitchbend value immediately after each noteon. Pitchbend + - tritone." ...i have no idea, i will wait for the UPDATE

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a trial version of the new conTimbre-player-maxpatch (from thomas hummel), now the opusmodus-tuning also works well in conTimbre.

I think it will be in the next update ... 🙂


...i like it more in cents then in float...

(defun cents-to-tuning (centlist)
  (a*x 0.01 centlist))

(cents-to-tuning '(-14 +50 5))
=> (-0.14 0.5 0.049999997)


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Topics

    • By Andy
      I was wondering what was the preferred method to store snippets? I come across quick ideas I want to quickly store away for future.
      There seems to be two choices..make a .opmo file or 'save the last file as .xml' under the File menu. Are there any others? I guess an xml file is good for seeing the notation rapidly but effectively renders the snippet dead as it loses the reference to the code and an .opmo file keeps the code... though this needs to be evaluated to see the notation quickly. 
    • By torstenanders
      Dear all,

      I updated my library tot (https://github.com/tanders/tot) in various ways. In particular, there are many new functions available.

      You can now read the documentation online at https://tanders.github.io/tot/. However, remember that you can directly evaluate the many examples in the documentation when (after installing the library) you drag the library folder into your Opusmodus project navigator and open the documentation within Opusmodus.
      If you are interested in the details of how the library developed, you can see a changelog at https://github.com/tanders/tot/commits/master .

      NOTE: When you install/upgrade this library, make sure you also install/upgrade all its dependencies, as described in the detailed installation instructions at https://github.com/tanders/tot. 
      PS: This is not an official release. As I am primarily developing this library for my own purposes, I keep it rather informal and extend it on a continuous basis for my own composition projects. Anyway, I thought at least some of you might be interested to learn that there have been many developments 🙂
    • By torstenanders
      Is there a way a way to extend an existing library? For example, for a specific composition I may want to collect a library of rhythms, melodic fragments etc., to arrange and transform these later with existing library features. Is it possible to by and by extend a library so that instead of, say, defining
      (setf rhythm1 (length-divide 1 3 '(q)))  
      I instead may write something like
      (setf (library 'new-piece 'rhythms 'rhythm1) (length-divide 1 3 '(q)))  
      Asked differently: what is the internal data structure of the existing library feature(s)? Is it possible to get access to that data for user-defined functions etc.?
      Also, is it possible to export an existing library into a file?
      BTW: Why are all these quotes necessary in calls to functions like library and many others -- why is the function library not a macro instead (only at the top-most level of course as syntactic sugar, I am certainly not suggesting to have macros instead of functions in principle).
      Thank you very much!
  • Create New...