Jump to content

articulation with audulus 3

AM

By AM,
in OMN Lingo

 Share Followers 0

Recommended Posts

AM

AM

Posted
Posted

dear janusz

 

at the moment i'm working with AUDULUS 3 and OPMO, work's fine.

but there are some problems with the articulation. is it possible that in ord. there is a little "overlapping" between two notes? in this case AUDULUS don't "recognize" a change of velocity etc... with stacc it works fine (but with a gap).

 

is there a "non-overlapping"-articulation with almost no gap between the notes?

 

thanks

andré

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
AM

AM

Posted
  • Author
Posted

okay, then it seems to be a AUDULUS- or MOD-SYNTH-"problem".

(audulus is only for simulation, real mod-synth for live)

 

thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Followers 0
Go to topic listing

  • Similar Topics

    • JulioHerrlein
      OMN articulation Customization
      By JulioHerrlein
      Dear Friends,
       
      In a previous post (link below) there is a great description on how to configure old vsl gig versions.
       
      There is a place where you can configure the relation between the OMN articulation command with the correspondent keyswitch.
       
      QUESTIONS:
       
      1) Let´s say I invent a new articulation in a custom sample library, for example "nail-scrape" for indicating the violin player to scrape the string with his/her nail. In this case, I need this OMN expression to: a) apear in the score notation and b) change the corresponding keyswitch.
      2) In the case of the OMN expression "long",  I configured it to change to the crescendo/diminuendo long samples in VSL, but this does not appear in the notation. This is great, because I don´t need it to be specified in the notation, since the long note values are enough, I just need the keyswitch.
       
      So there is the two scenarios:
      1) CASE 1:  OMN change keyswitch AND appear on the score
      1) CASE 1:  OMN change keyswitch AND DO NOT appear on the score
       
      The articulation expression syntax is a kind of yellow/brown word in the OMN code. Only articulation related words appear as an assignable articulation for this kind of use.
       
      FINALLY, THE GREAT QUESTION:
       
      How can I create my CUSTOM articulation OMN expression, like the "nail-scrape" example, so that this articulation can be customized also as appearing or not appearing in the score ?
       
      This can be really useful for expanded techniques in special scores with special sample libraries or even with scores based on customized samples, or new instruments.
       
      All the best !
       
      Julio Herrlein
       
      :group omn stacc (:key c1 :key c1 cc1 40) stacs (:key c1 :key c1 cc1 25) ord (:key eb1 cc1 5) portato (:key cs1 cc1 5) sfz (:key e1 :key e1 cc1 25) cres (:key f1 :key f1 cc1 25) marc (:key e1 cc1 64) spicc (:key c1 cc1 120) leg (:key d1 :key d1 cc1 40) tasto (:key cs2 :key cs1 cc1 40) leg+tasto (:key cs2 :key cs1 cc1 40) tasto+leg (:key cs2 :key cs1 cc1 40)  
       
    • Stephane Boussuge
      omn-replace-articulation-if-repeat
      By Stephane Boussuge
      Hi,
      i've made this function for my own usage.
      Sharing here if it can be useful for some others.
      It is a function who replace articulation by a given one on repeated notes.
      Best
      SB.
       
      ;;; OMN-REPLACE-ARTICULATION-IF-REPEAT (defun omn-replace-articulation-if-repeat (new-art omn-sequence) (do-verbose ("omn-replace-articulation-if-repeat") (let ((spn '()) (res '()) ) (progn (setf spn (get-span omn-sequence)) (setf res (loop for i from 0 to (- (length (flatten-sublist (single-events omn-sequence))) 1) collect (if (or (eq (second (nth i (flatten-sublist (single-events omn-sequence)))) (second (nth (+ 1 i) (flatten-sublist (single-events omn-sequence))))) (if (> i 0) (eq (second (nth i (flatten-sublist (single-events omn-sequence)))) (second (nth (- i 1) (flatten-sublist (single-events omn-sequence))))) ) ) (omn-replace :articulation new-art (nth i (flatten-sublist (single-events omn-sequence)))) (nth i (flatten-sublist (single-events omn-sequence))) ))) (length-span spn (flatten res)))))) ;;; EXEMPLE #| (setf mat '((s c4 p leg d4 leg e4 leg f4 q g4 f marc)(s a4 mp leg g4 leg leg f4 leg e4 leg leg leg d4 q c4 mf marc))) (omn-replace-articulation-if-repeat '(stacc) mat) => '((s c4 p leg d4 leg e4 leg f4 q g4 f marc) (s a4 mp leg g4 stacc g4 stacc f4 leg e4 stacc e4 stacc e4 stacc d4 q c4 mf marc)) |#  
       
    • AM
      replace-articulation-of-a-length
      By AM
      if you like to change the articulation of specific lengths
       
      (defun replace-articulation-of-a-length (omnseq length/articulation-map) (loop for i in (single-events (flatten omnseq)) when (length-restp (car i)) collect i else append (omn-replace :articulation (cadr (assoc (car (omn :length i)) length/articulation-map)) i))) (setf omn-seq '(s c4 ffff ord e ord e ord s ord e. ord s ord q ord q q q q)) (replace-articulation-of-a-length omn-seq '((1/16 mute) (2/16 pizz) (3/16 arco))) => (s c4 ffff mute e c4 ffff pizz e c4 ffff pizz s c4 ffff mute e. c4 ffff arco s c4 ffff mute q c4 ffff ord q c4 ffff q c4 ffff q c4 ffff q c4 ffff)  
×
×
  • Create New...