Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
torstenanders

length-divide: ensuring that all possibly matching notes are split

Recommended Posts

Revising some older code of my I noticed that the function length-divide changed its behaviour somewhat and became more likely to cause an error.

 

In a previous version, where the arguments count and divide where given separately, it was possible to set the count to some very high number, say, 1000, simply to mean that all notes the function can split (depending on its other arguments) will be split. 

 

Meanwhile, the function have been revised to introduce control over intervals (thank you 🙂), but since then it seems it is not possible anymore to set an arbitrarily high count value anymore. For example, the following code now results in an error. I would prefer the previous behaviour, if only because it is more forgiving and stable.

 

(length-divide '(1000 2) '(q ab3 num1+leg c4 leg e ab3 leg g3 leg ab3 num1+leg c4 leg))
Error: The value ab3 is not of the expected type sequence.

 

In case it helps: my debugger tells me the functions gen-repeat and then maybe-section are called (perhaps within a nested function of length-divide* ?) with an argument sequence bound to ab3 (i.e. a plain pitch), and a call (length ab3) then causes this error. 

 

Thank you!

 

Best,

Torsten

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not getting any error with the expression. You will need to wait for the upgrade.

We have started work on microtonality 🙂

 

Best,

Janusz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

>  You will need to wait for the upgrade.

 

No worries, I already applied a workaround (disabling certain code...).

 

Here is another issue I ran into with length-divide: if the argument ignore is set to either min or max, and all note values are of the same length, then that also causes an error. Now, perhaps that should be expected, but then at least the error message could be more helpful. On the other hand, perhaps it would be preferable in this situation if a warning was printed and the effect of the argument ignore was, well, ignored? 

 

(length-divide '(1 4) 
               '(1/8 c4 mf num1+leg 1/8 d4 mf num1+leg 1/8 fs3 mf leg 1/8 gs3 mf)
               :ignore 'min)
Error: The value nil is not of the expected type number.

 

> We have started work on microtonality  

👍 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, opmo said:

I am not getting any error with the expression.

 

Just for the record, when I start Opusmodus without any of my extensions, I run into the same problem.

? (length-divide '(1000 2) '(q ab3 num1+leg c4 leg e ab3 leg g3 leg ab3 num1+leg c4 leg))
length-divide, set: nil ignore: nil section: nil exclude: nil seed: 35424
> Error: The value ab3 is not of the expected type sequence.
> While executing: ccl::sequence-type, in process Listener-1(7).
> Type cmd-. to abort, cmd-\ for a list of available restarts.
> Type :? for other options.
1 > 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

> We have started work on microtonality  🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Topics

    • By spuki
      Hi there,
      i'm a excited beginner with OM!
      Just exploring and modifying the turotials.
       
      One Question:
      What would be a good approach to sort the notes which are generated from the snippet below to, say, a scale.
      In other words: The outoot below is chromatic. How can i turn it into a scale, eg. d-phrygian)
      Thank you!
       
      (setf size 60)
      (setf vector
            (gen-sine
             size 1 '(0.5 0.4 0.3 0.6)
             :modulation (gen-sine size 1 0.3 :phase 180)))
      (setf pitchvec (vector-to-pitch '(g1 g6) vector))
       
    • By torstenanders
      The function LENGTH-DIVIDE and friends are a useful device for introducing some rhythmic variation to some material. However, when the processed sequence is a full OMN expression (see example below), then the added notes cause all other parameters to shift forward (additional parameters are added at the end by looping). For introducing only a slight variation to some existing material (e.g., motif) these functions are therefore not so useful, because this shift of all parameters to basically "fill" the new added notes with pitches etc. greatly change the varied material for a listener.
      (length-divide 1 2 '(q f3 leg+m1 q ab3 leg e c4 leg bb3 leg ab3 leg g3))  
      Basically, this is the opposite situation of the situation addressed by swallowing. Swallowing (e.g., with GEN-SWALLOW and the swallow argument of many other functions) avoids the shift of parameters like pitch etc. that would result from removing notes and turning them into rests. For addressing the situation above properly we would need something like the opposite of swallowing, some way to fill in parameters like pitch etc. for new notes to avoid shifting existing notes. I hope my explanation makes sense and you can see why something like the opposite of swallowing would be useful for functions that add notes to some input material.
       
      Now, the tricky question is of course, what parameters (pitch etc.) should be added in such cases. Musically useful and common in the classical literature would be, e.g., repeating the parameters (pitch etc.) of the predecessor note (though that might be a bit too simplistic and annoying at times) or somehow interpolating some pitch gap between the previous and next note with a little scale or arpeggio and only repeating the other parameters like articulations (resulting in some variation that is likely most similar to the input material, so it would be good to have that as an option).  If the pitch interval between the two original notes is too small to add some pitch in between for the new now (or as an option in general for variety), it would also be good  to add some ornamentation (e.g., using PITCH-ORNAMENT), but for a close similarity between the original material and the variation it would be best as an option to apply such ornamentation only to the newly added notes, not all notes. Of course, other options could also be useful for variations that vary the input material a bit more strongly, e.g., some random pitch for the new notes within certain interval bounds.
       
      Does some function that kind of is the opposite of GEN-SWALLOW in that it adds parameters like pitches for subdivided rhythmic values (to avoid the shifting) sound like a good idea?
       
      The idea with the interpolation of gaps could be implemented by turning the original duration values and pitches into some envelope and then reading that envelope with the new rhythmic values. So, that is rather strait forward. However, that would not allow for some ornamentation, because such algorithm would not recognise which notes are new that should be ornamented.
       
      Any other idea perhaps? Thanks! 
    • By JulioHerrlein
      In the jazz world, Barry Harris came up with the idea of harmonizing a bebop scale.
      Combining a C6 (C, E, G, A) and a Bdim7 (B, D, F, Ab) chords, we have this scale:
       

       
      From this stantpoint we can alternate tonic and dominant sounds, like this:
       

       
      Every pair of chords have all the 8-note set.
      The notes C,E, G and A are always harmonized with a C6 chord.
      The notes D, F, Ab and B are always harmonized with a Bdim7 chord.
       
      So, from the point of view of sets, there is no problem.
       
      WHAT IS NEEDED:
       
      I want a way to start FROM the melody, and then make a four part block harmonization with this (or any other) harmonic system
       from the melody as an OMN expression.
       
      So, I need a way to filter the notes to aply the right chord:
       
      FOR EXAMPLE:
       
      For the notes C, E, G and A
      If the note is an C (in any register), I will apply a chord like , I will add the notes A, G and E, below the melody.
      If the note is an  (in any register), I will apply a chord like , I will add the notes G, E and C, below the melody.
      And so on...
      For the notes D, F, Ab and B:
       
      If the note is an B (in any register), I will apply a chord like , I will add the notes Ab, F and D, below the melody.
      And so on:
       
      So, to make any procedure:
       
      I need first find a way to apply a specific procedure only over the notes I want, over all the C notes, all the B notes, etc.
       
      How to filter from an OMN expression ?
       
      All the best !
      Julio
       
       
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...