Jump to content

Transistions between attributes, e.g., ord. -> sul tasto

Recommended Posts

Thanks for your quick response.


However, I am not so such whether it would be best to define an extra symbol ord->tasto, because that would mean that a very large number of new symbols should be added. Instead, it would be better to have (in a later version, perhaps version 2) some kind of operator that can combine attributes, like currently the operator + does already for attributes. Lets assume that operator would be notated >, then a large number of transitions would be possible with one addition including ord>tasto, tasto>ord, ponte>tasto, tasto>ponte, tasto>ponte>tasto etc. -- at that is just a subset related to the position where the bow meets the string..., other articulations and other instruments would need many more.


In the meantime, we may simply use the existing operator + instead (e.g., ord+tasto), and then revise the resulting score manually to change that to a true transition. This approach would allow for both transitions on a single note, and over several notes -- in the latter can the combined attribute is added to the required number of consecutive notes (as can be done with leg right now).




Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy