Posted December 19, 20168 yr Is there a way to define transitions of playing techniques over one and multiple notes? For example, how to notate for a string instrument the following? ord. -> sul tasto Thanks! Best, Torsten
December 19, 20168 yr Author Thanks for your quick response. However, I am not so such whether it would be best to define an extra symbol ord->tasto, because that would mean that a very large number of new symbols should be added. Instead, it would be better to have (in a later version, perhaps version 2) some kind of operator that can combine attributes, like currently the operator + does already for attributes. Lets assume that operator would be notated >, then a large number of transitions would be possible with one addition including ord>tasto, tasto>ord, ponte>tasto, tasto>ponte, tasto>ponte>tasto etc. -- at that is just a subset related to the position where the bow meets the string..., other articulations and other instruments would need many more. In the meantime, we may simply use the existing operator + instead (e.g., ord+tasto), and then revise the resulting score manually to change that to a true transition. This approach would allow for both transitions on a single note, and over several notes -- in the latter can the combined attribute is added to the required number of consecutive notes (as can be done with leg right now). Best, Torsten
Create an account or sign in to comment