Rangarajan Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 The filter-tie function allows the keyword parameter :omn. On initial reading, I thought this would return the result in OMN form if :omn t is supplied as the option. But that is not the case. Just wondering if changing the behaviour slightly would be useful. For example, (filter-tie (list '(c4 c4 c4 d4 d4 e4) '(e e e e e e)) :omn t) => (q. c4 q d4 e e4) instead of ((c4 d4 e4) (q. q e)) If :omn nil (the default), then the result would be ((c4 d4 e4) (q. q e)) -Rangarajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephane Boussuge Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 generaly we use filter-tie this way: (filter-tie '(e c4 = = = = = = =)) =>(w c4) SB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangarajan Posted February 27, 2016 Author Share Posted February 27, 2016 What you have given is perfectly acceptable. The example I gave is from the documentation of the function, where the pitches and lengths are given separately. My observation was with respect to that usage pattern. Anyway, if that pattern is not common, then my suggestion is not very relevant. Regards, Rangarajan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephane Boussuge Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 your observation is true, I just tried to help you with the usage of Opusmodus. Regards SB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.