dear all

 

i want to code a simple function for sending midi-cc in an "all-in-one"-function (to external devices like filterbank or microcosm)

it works more or less.... but there are two bugs i can't fix.

 

the function:

 

(defun filterbank (&key cc value-range (time-range '(1 127)) (port 7) (channel 16))
  (let ((values (loop 
               for i in (rnd-sample 100 (gen-integer (first value-range) (second value-range)))
               for j in (gen-length (gen-integer (first time-range) (second time-range)) 1/128)
               collect (list i j))))

    (live-coding-midi 
     (compile-score 
      (def-score cc-seq
          (:title "cc-seq"
           :key-signature 'chromatic
           :time-signature '(4 4)
           :tempo 60) 
        (seq
         :length '(3)
         :pitch '(c4)
         :velocity '(ff)
         :port port
         :channel channel
         :controllers (1 values)))))))

(filterbank :cc 1 :value-range '(40 99) :port 1)

 

problem 1: when i evaluate the function and run it ONCE - everything okay. when i like to RUN it a second time there is an error, i don't know why. then i have to evaluate the FUNCTION again... why?

 

problem 2: i would like to "replace"  :controllers (1 values)  by  :controllers (cc values)

-> so that i can choose the cc-number by a variable "cc". but it don't work - any hints? 

 

thanx for some help

andré

 

 

I think for this kind of tasks it could help to have functions like this:

 

(send-midi-note :note 60 :velocity 20 :chan 0 :dest 0 :dur 'q)

(send-controller :num 1 :val 60 :chan 0 :dest 0 :dur 'q :endval 10)

 

Bypassing score, notation, midi-player, live-coding. 

Just instant MIDI-output on cmd-e or inside of code.

Then you could write functions ,loops or just for testing or setting up your devices. 

 

What do you think?

 

I assume live-coding-midi is not made to run inside of a functions.

 

 

 

it's not a problem with live-coding - cc-messages are sended perfectly, but...

 

 

 

but, when i try to evaluate a few times, the error comes up - it seems to me to be a problem with "controllers" inside a new function => when i evaluate for the second time it's always:

Error: Controllers must be alternating names/numbers and values.

 

i have no idea, why this is a problem when doing more the 1 eval...

 

Send me the code please.

that's the code

 

(defun filterbank (&key cc value-range (time-range '(1 127)) (port 7) (channel 16))
  (let ((values (loop 
               for i in (rnd-sample 100 (gen-integer (first value-range) (second value-range)))
               for j in (gen-length (gen-integer (first time-range) (second time-range)) 1/128)
               collect (list i j))))

    (live-coding-midi 
     (compile-score 
      (def-score cc-seq
          (:title "cc-seq"
           :key-signature 'chromatic
           :time-signature '(4 4)
           :tempo 60) 
        (seq
         :length '(3)
         :pitch '(c4)
         :velocity '(ff)
         :port port
         :channel channel
         :controllers (1 values)))))))

(filterbank :cc 1 :value-range '(40 99) :port 1)

 

You need to eval the function again:

 

(progn
  (defun filterbank (&key cc value-range (time-range '(1 127)) (port 7) (channel 16))
    (let ((values (loop 
                     for i in (rnd-sample 100 (gen-integer (first value-range) (second value-range)))
                     for j in (gen-length (gen-integer (first time-range) (second time-range)) 1/128)
                     collect (list i j))))
      
      (live-coding-midi 
       (compile-score 
        (def-score cc-seq
            (:title "cc-seq"
             :key-signature 'chromatic
             :time-signature '(4 4)
             :tempo 60) 
          (seq
           :length '(3)
           :pitch '(c4)
           :velocity '(ff)
           :port 1
           :channel channel
           :controllers (1 values)))))))

  (filterbank :cc 1 :value-range '(40 99) :port 1)

  )

i know. but the question is/was, how it could work without eval each time. i would like to put my function in my library, so "EVAL again" is not a solution - that's the idea of DEFUN 😄