Jump to content

lsystem - extension idea


Recommended Posts


;;; a little extension for lsystems, i needed all generations, not only the final one. i think for in-time-processes it's more interesting, because you will hear/see the way of "growing/developing"

;;; perhaps JANUSZ could extended the original OPMO-function. keep attention about stack-overflow if you have LARGE DEPth :-)


;;; function
(defun all-gen-lsystem (ls &key depth )
  (loop repeat (1+ depth)
    for i from 0 to depth
    collect (rewrite-lsystem ls :depth i)))

                    
;;; setup

(defclass sieve_1 (l-system)
  ((axiom :initform '(1))
   (depth :initform 10)))

(defmethod l-productions ((ls sieve_1))
  (choose-production ls
                     (1 (--> 2 1))
                     (2 (--> 4))
                     (4 (--> 2 6))
                     (6 (--> 1))))

;;; example

; new => all gen
(all-gen-lsystem 'sieve_1 :depth 3)
=> ((1) (2 1) (4 2 1) (2 6 4 2 1))

; original => only last gen
(rewrite-lsystem 'sieve_1 :depth 3)
=> (2 6 4 2 1) 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want more control over the L-system generation, have a look at the original documentation of the system L-Lisp, from which Janusz derived the Opusmodus functionality: 

 

Erstad, K. A. (2002) L-systems, twining plants, Lisp. Master’s thesis thesis. University of Bergen. [online]. Available from: http://www.vcn.bc.ca/~griffink/lisp_lsystems.pdf
 
 
Best,
Torsten
Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you, torsten! 🙂 

(at the moment, I'm thinking about what the GAP is between visual visual l-systems (images, you see the whole "gestalt") and acoustic ones (which more has to do with the PROCESS in time, musical grammar...). the handling / perception / .... is a completely different one)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the GAP is between visual L-systems and acoustic ones

 

Yes, of course, there is a completely different way of perception at play. If you come up with a good answer to that, I would be interested.

 

BTW, if you want some other examples of compositional applications, you might want to have a look at ”Cells” (1993/94) by Hanspeter Kyburz, discussed in the following two publications.

 

 

Supper, M. (2001) A Few Remarks on Algorithmic Composition. Computer Music Journal. 25 (1), 48–53.

 

Holz, E. (2012) Das Wachstumprinzip von L-Systemen in der Musik von Hanspeter Kyburz. Master’s thesis. Hochschule für Musik Hanns Eisler.  Available from: http://www.eresholz.de/de/text/Eres Holz_Ausschnitt aus der Masterarbeit.pdf(Accessed 20 September 2016).
 
Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, torsten!

i know hanspeter kyburz (i almost studied with him 😀 - and because of him i started working with algorithms) and i know some of his works (CELLS / PARTS / ....). if you have the article of ERES HOLZ as pdf, would be nice (the link seems to be dead)...

 

 

only some short thoughts - not on an scientific research level 😉

 

isn't it - in general - a question about complexity and information? 

and complexity/information changes when you are changing/crossing the MEDIA. that means: from algorithms/code/mathematics to sound/music or visuals... also the complexity itself changes, it's like  transforming... "the complexities" are different - the manifestation of it. so it's quite simple - and you feel so important and intelligent and "arty" 😉 - when you TAKE a really advanced mathematical/algorithmic grammar/process as a TOOL, ...but in accoustic perception the result could be quite "noise", because the musical complexity is different and depends - in my opinion - a lot on "how you map these things", on which musical  parameters and objects, in which dimensions...

 

of course, it's also interesting to use such things - like algorithms -  in a way of "creative misunderstanding" (as i think ferneyhough once mentioned in different context), but we should be aware of the GAPS:  algorithmic complexity - effective complexity.

 

what do you think?

 

greetings

andré

 

 

HEINZ VON FöRSTER had some really good thoughts on such things - in an abstract way... here is an article....

disorder:order.pdf

 

and an article from DAVID GALANTER...

Galanter_2003_What is Generative Art Complexity theory as a context for art theory.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have the article of ERES HOLZ as pdf, would be nice (the link seems to be dead)...

 

See attached.

 

> isn't it - in general - a question about complexity and information? 

 

I think it is also a question of memory -- we can only perceive a form if we can remember the form parts (Schönberg talks about comprehensibility/Fasslichkeit) which then allows us to compare etc. Obviously, that is more easy in a visual form, where you can see the whole picture together and move between parts at your own pace.

 

Best,

Torsten

 

 Holz_2012_Das Wachstumprinzip von L-Systemen in der Musik von Hanspeter Kyburz.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy